XLK vs VGT: Which Technology ETF Is Better?

Comparisons7 min readUpdated March 17, 2026
XLK vs VGT: Which Technology ETF Is Better?

Key Takeaways

  • XLK tracks the S&P Technology Select Sector Index (capped weighting); VGT tracks the broader MSCI US IMI IT 25/50 Index.
  • VGT holds roughly 300+ stocks versus XLK's 65, providing broader technology sector coverage.
  • XLK charges 0.09% while VGT charges 0.10% — a negligible difference.
  • XLK is more top-heavy due to capping rules; VGT's broader holdings provide marginally more diversification.

XLK and VGT are the two most popular technology sector ETFs, but they track different indexes with different methodologies. For a sector that dominates most portfolios, understanding these differences matters.

Index Methodology

XLK tracks the S&P Technology Select Sector Index, which holds approximately 65 stocks from the S&P 500's technology sector. VGT tracks the MSCI US Investable Market Index Information Technology 25/50, which includes over 300 technology stocks spanning large, mid, and small caps.

The "25/50" in VGT's index name refers to concentration limits: no stock can exceed 25% of the index, and all stocks above 5% cannot collectively exceed 50%. XLK has its own capping rules based on the Select Sector methodology.

Holdings Comparison

The top holdings overlap significantly — Apple, Microsoft, and Nvidia dominate both funds. Where they differ is at the bottom: VGT includes hundreds of smaller tech companies that XLK excludes. This gives VGT marginally better diversification within the technology sector.

Performance

Returns are closely correlated since both are dominated by the same mega-cap tech stocks. Performance differences in any given year rarely exceed 1-2%. The divergence comes from different capping rules and VGT's small-cap inclusion, which can help or hurt depending on whether small-cap tech is outperforming. Check XLK vs VGT comparison data for current performance.

Which to Choose

VGT provides broader tech exposure with more mid and small-cap names. XLK provides concentrated large-cap tech. Both charge essentially the same fee (0.09% vs 0.10%). If you want pure large-cap tech, XLK works. If you want the full technology sector including smaller companies, VGT is better. Visit our education center for more on sector investing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which tech ETF has better performance?
Performance alternates depending on which top holdings are outperforming. Since both concentrate in the same mega-cap tech stocks, returns are very similar over longer periods. The minor differences come from VGT's inclusion of mid and small-cap tech stocks and different index capping methodologies.
Do XLK and VGT include the same stocks?
There is significant overlap in the top holdings (Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, etc.), but the indexes define technology differently. GICS sector classification changes have moved some companies in and out of the technology sector. VGT's broader index includes more mid-cap and small-cap tech names.
Is QQQ a better tech ETF than XLK or VGT?
QQQ is not strictly a tech ETF — it tracks the Nasdaq 100, which includes non-tech companies like Costco and PepsiCo while excluding financial-sector tech. QQQ provides tech-heavy exposure with some diversification. XLK and VGT are purer technology sector plays.

Related Articles

More in Comparisons

View all →

Ready to explore ETFs?

Use our free tools to research, compare, and find the right ETFs for your portfolio.

Explore ETFs on ETF Beacon